I have been applying things I have learnt through outside
reading (mainly Walter Murch’s In the Blink of an Eye) during the editing
process of ‘The Conductor’, so I can be more effective and create a better
final film.
My main concern for this film, and all short films I edit,
is how many cuts will be needed between different shots and whether or not
these will work with the pace of the film or if they will be to obvious and to
jarring for the audience. “What we do seem to have difficulty accepting are the
kind of displacements that are neither subtle nor total.” [1; Pg 6]
What Murch means here is that the audience’s attention will be drawn to the
physical nature of each cut if they aren’t too subtle to notice or are
completely different from one another. When the audience recognises these cuts, their
immersion and engagement with the story is broken and they become aware that
they’re watching a constructed image, instead of being told a story.
Leading on from this, ‘The Conductor’ relies on the audience
believing what they see is a visual construct of a daydream, so the audience
must be fully immersed is fantasy style world in order to engage with the
character and narrative. When I first assembled the film it began with the set
up of the character, his location, his reaction to the location, then finally
him doing his job (cleaning) before moving into the daydream world. After
watching it back and showing it in the rough cut screening I remembered Murch’s
rule regarding audience engagement: “Always
try to do the most with the least.” “…you want to do only what is necessary to
engage the audience—suggestion is always more effective that exposition.”[1;
Pg 15] This made me re-assess the cut and realise that almost none of the
start was needed and could be stripped down to get the audience into the
narrative straight away.
Finally, I’ve always tried to keep an objective view on each
film I edit so that the cut isn’t influenced by my involvement with a specific
shot or shoot day in any way. However, due to the group sizes of student films,
it is almost impossible to be completely objective and distant from
pre-production and filming on set so I always try to view it as an audience
member, instead of ‘seeing around the edge of the frame’. “The editor… should try to see only what’s on the screen, as the
audience will.”[1; Pg 24] I have tried my best to do this
throughout the majority of the edit, which I hope will be reflected with the
outcome of our final film.
452 Words
Bibliography
1. Murch, Walter (1988); In the Blink of an Eye; New York: Viking Press
No comments:
Post a Comment